![]() |
![]() |
| introduction
an interesting question of gender
|
an interesting question of gender page 1/2 The issue of gender representation within screen based industries has been an ongoing concern for WIFT(victoria). This manifested itself in Women In Motion as the question of whether or not boys should be included in the audience. "What is
a rude group of adolescent blokes doing in here?" Given the theory behind Women in Motion, it is unsurprising that the question of whether or not the audiences should include boys as well as girls was an ongoing debate. The organisers of Women In Motion have every year come to terms with this by allowing boys to come, but firmly placing the emphasis of the entire event on the opportunities for, and experiences of, women. Whilst the vast majority of the audiences were female, boys were never actively excluded, "...that was always an interesting question, should we exclude boys. I went through that over and over again, like every year that we got boys who were a pain in the ass, and we'd always get a few, I would think, oh you know next year I wonder if we should exclude boys completely? And we never did decide to exclude them, I mean there was partly a feeling that for the ones who came, and who weren't disruptive in any way, it was terrific...it was a great education for them too, and usually they were very outnumbered which usually kept them quiet which was good...if there is only a handful of boys then it means the girls are the ones who are asking most of the questions. Which is good, that's the way we want it to be in this particular context. But occasionally we'd get these large mixed groups where the boys would be loud and obnoxious or would be try to be disruptive or we had a bit of that. Not too much." (Marsha Emerman 2000)
Whilst it was felt that the overall success of the program was only enhanced by their presence, the young women involved remained the focus: "[it]...was pitched completely to opportunities for young women to get into this business that was entirely the focus, so really..., they stood to benefit the most from it and that was very clearly intentioned." (Sue Maslin 2000) |
| This history was researched and written by Mia Treacey. This site is published in good faith and based on accurate and reliable information. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information in this site is accurate and up-to-date. No liability can be accepted for error or omission. The author welcomes advice of any changes or corrections. No part of this history or site may be reproduced by any process without written permission of the author. Copyright © 2000 Mia Treacey |